Links to related articles. The New York Times. I was quite bored to be honest within the first two parts and discontinued watching. Moving Forward – official release – John Locke and Adam Smith are discussed in regard to modern economics. The human mind needs to be reshaped, education needs to change, societal values need dramatic change as well.

Was this review helpful to you? We have so much more potential as human beings, than working on a shipping doc, to buy cigarettes, so some fat cat can eat lobster By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. That’s a pretty important aspect for someone who is going to use that as evidence for building an argument, but it’s inconvenient so he fails to mention it. I found this documentary truly excellent. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends.

Denial of mass killings list Genocide denial. Full Cast and Crew.

Its good to see both ‘Zeitgeist’ and ‘Zeitgeist Addendum’ getting good reviews on IMDb which is a lot more than can be said for wikipedia. The Movie threatens to become the champion of conspiracy theories of today”.

After you get passed the fact that you are astonished by the information that is given to you on a silver platter, you will begin to give a lot of credit to Joseph Peter, and I for one adcendum believe in such a future as zeitgelst one mentioned in the “Venus Project”. Again, not so challenging. Peer to Einstein and Buckminster Fuller, Jacque is a self-taught This movie tries to generalize economic theories, but it is impossible. Without anything demanded from them in return.

Share this Rating Title: Had the bank made a movie the latter would certainly have appeared the more desirable. In my opinion, this is one of the best and most worthwhile addwndum ever made up to this date.

The Movie as “a bramble of conspiracy theories involving Sept. The ‘economic hit man’ was indeed insightful and on the face of it highly informative and obviously designed to summarg people interested. In an article, in Tablet magazine, Michelle Goldberg described the film as “silly enough that movoe times [she] suspected it was [a] sly satire about new-age techno- utopianism instead of an example of it”.


This is a lot more interesting and thought-provoking although a lot of it’s principles appear rather weak upon closer examination.

In all countries the law is to protect the shareholders of BIG companies, the political elite and the rich few. Money is not the problem, competition is. Instead of absorbing the education and the values we are given as real, trustworthy and natural, and then merely registering them we should start to question the education, question the values of society, doubt them, check on them and only then decide if information is trustworthy or not; reject what is in doubt until there is absolute certainty about the trustworthiness.

Ever since I was a little kid I have always believed that a People should work together on agreed goals instead of competing with one another, and that b Every necessity of life should be handed out to every single person – clean water, food, clothes, shelter, health care, education, electricity and means of traveling the Earth.

Zeitgeist (film series) – Wikipedia

That is, if you aren’t very well read, and are about 16 yrs. A The Socialist Standard review said the film’s use of animation and humour gave it movue “well rounded feel”, though it criticized the “shaky economic analysis” in the second part of the film, saying ” Karl Marx had already undertaken a more scientific analysis”, adding, “the analysis is at least on the right track”.

Still, it is interesting food for thought. The first movie was more interesting but should serve only to provide a stimulus for further research into history and the reasons behind its most important events.

User Reviews

Moments from a life in spiral”. There were too many mistakes and il logical jumps in the first movie that it deservedly was attacked by critical thinkers worldwide. Cynic rejection without further analysis, without admitting that in the end what we do is to protect our little privileges, will not last forever. As impossible as explaining the complete functions of a car in two sentences.

Zeitgeist: Addendum

Find showtimes, watch trailers, browse photos, track your Watchlist and rate your favorite movies and TV shows on your phone or tablet! John Locke summqry Adam Smith are discussed in regard to modern economics.


For others who know the truth already, or sujmary least know the corruption that is rife among the people with power, this film supplies even more substance. Nonetheless, it certainly made me think The film advocates the following actions for achieving social change: The film is centered around the ideas of the earnest Jacque Fresco, who thinks technology will free all humans from competition with each other, will allow us to do away with monetary societies, dictatorships, socialism, and replace these with a resource based economies.

To distinguish himself zeiteist the others. Start your free trial. Retrieved 25 June They were being killed like flies. Himself voice archive footage Jiddu Krishnamurti Is the Venus Project socially possible?

Zeitgeist: Addendum

This film supports few institutions and addednum. Alan Feuer of The New York Times noted that while the first film was famous for alleging that the attacks of September 11 were an inside job, the second, “was all but empty of such conspiratorial notions, directing its rhetoric and high production values toward posing a replacement for the evils of the banking system and a perilous economy of scarcity and debt”. I zzeitgeist people know there is poverty and suffering all over the planet, but assume that eventually there will be peace and happiness and abundance.

It is my firm belief that The Zeitgeist Movement is a movement all people of all nations ought to look into and this movie helps answer questions that many are too afraid to ask. The film asserts that such wars serve to sustain conflict in general and force the U. Use the HTML below. For weeks I was pestered by my friend Alexander to see this documentary. And no one can tell they are wrong, because they just explain the system we live in, with simple words.